232808
235212

Should victims of sexual offences be able to opt out of publication bans?

Poll: Publication bans

The federal justice minister says he is open to updating the Victims Bill of Rights after a parliamentary report called on the federal government to make changes, including allowing victims of sexual offences to opt out of publication bans.

Witnesses at the House of Commons justice committee said that publication bans are essential and should be available to victims who want them in place — so long as they are consulted first.

But judges often impose publication bans to protect the identity of complainants in sexual offences at the request of the Crown. Some victims of sexual assault say they have had to fight to control the use of their own names.

A victim-centred approach would give people a choice, the committee heard.

"The most important thing for moving forward is for survivors to be able to have meaningful choices in terms of whether a publication ban is implemented and when one is removed," Kat Owens, a project director at the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund, told the committee.

"The complicated process of removing one's own publication ban puts up hurdles for victims who wish, for example, to be free to speak," the report says.

The committee is recommending changes to the Criminal Code so that victims must be informed before a publication ban is imposed, and so they have the ability to opt out.

Justice Minister David Lametti said he has not yet read the committee's report, which was released Wednesday.

"Hopefully what the committee will do is give us further suggestions on ways to move forward, and I look forward to working with their recommendations," he said on Thursday.

Lametti said he is open to thinking about changes to the law and is "never closed to a good suggestion."

Read more

Have an opinion? Send it to [email protected]



Previous Polls

April 20, 2024 - 8685 votes
Do you get medical insurance when you travel?

Yes: 7350
No: 1220
Unsure: 115

April 18, 2024 - 7335 votes
Do you agree with using surplus federal and military buildings for residential housing?

Yes: 4621
No: 2271
Unsure: 443

April 17, 2024 - 8646 votes
Should the federal government cut programs and staff to balance the budget before adding new taxes?

Yes: 6910
No: 1298
Unsure: 438

April 16, 2024 - 10935 votes
Should wealthy Canadians pay higher taxes?

Yes: 6840
No: 3488
Unsure: 607

April 15, 2024 - 7161 votes
What should be the main thrust of the federal budget—housing, affordability, tax reduction?

Housing: 751
Affordability: 2616
Tax reduction: 3794



Previous Poll Results

Do you get medical insurance when you travel?

Total Votes:  8685
Yes: 
84.63%
No: 
14.05%
Unsure: 
1.32%

» Previous Polls

Have an idea for a poll question?
Email us [email protected]


233566
233620