I fail to see how discussion on a topic makes the topic indisputably valid.
We also talk about Batman and Zeus a fair amount, does that make them real?
Your etymological argument is still more faulty. Are you saying that because "ghostbusters" exist, ghosts must exist?
A contrary position does not validate the original. This is basic logic.
A painter does not create a painting, he manipulates already existing materials in a certain way. He did not create canvas or oil.
If matter cannot spontaneously burst into existence, what did god make the universe out of? What is god made of?
If you are going to put forward an argument that claims to be based on logic, it behooves one to use real logic.
Cam Fish