I am a City of Kelowna property tax payer who is yet uncertain of the City's need to build another pool (50 meter or otherwise).
I frequent the Athans Pool complex in Rutland and have observed that this facility has plenty of excess capacity. There is usually only a handful of people there, (that is any time that I am using this facility). I also recall a few years back that the Johnson-Bentley facility on the Westside had to restructure it's financing strategy due to lack of users at that facility. I am not exactly sure how much capacity is available at the Parkinson Facility but can't envision it being over utilized when others are not.
I also observed that the City of Kelowna did not have a rush of proponents willing to enter into a Public-Private Partnership to build this new facility containing a fifty meter pool. Could this be because the Kelowna market does not warrant another pool facility, or perhaps more simply that it would not be a profitable undertaking. More probably the latter.
In an undertaking such as a construction project of this financial magnitude, I believe that City Council should let the rate-payers decide whether we want to endure a 4.5% property tax increase to pay for a facility that the private sector decided not to build.
When is the referendum?
WJM
RECENT STORIES
- Penticton market coming upSponsored Content - 12:01 am
- Village puts seniors firstSponsored Content - 12:01 am
- Future business leadersUBCO - 8:00 pm
- Poll: Whale rescuePoll - 7:30 pm
- Leafs even seriesSports - 7:00 pm
for these and other issues.
Previous Stories
- Spend at home first Apr 22
- RCMP 'lost its lustre' Apr 22
- Puzzled by deaths Apr 22
- Armed with bear spray Apr 22
- 'Embarrassing' view of city Apr 22
- Tax system not so bad Apr 20
- Disability benefit rollout Apr 20
- Don't eliminate tax credits Apr 20
- Buzzwords for homeless Apr 19
- Upset at council and traffic Apr 19
- 'Punitive' tax rates Apr 19
- Fire hydrant concern Apr 19
© 2024 Castanet.net