Castanet recently posted an article stating an unborn child was murdered due to a sharp object penetrating the womb.
This apparently brings to question the contrast between pro-life and pro-choice viewpoints. How can a man go to jail for the murder of his unborn child, while millions of unborn children are being murdered every day without consequence to those performing the action?
To send this man to jail would mean to also send hundreds of doctors and nurses and women performing the same act.
The only difference between this man and those choosing to abort lives, is the choice to do so.
Where do we draw the line? These cases are too similar for a line.
Shonah Nykiforuk