253670
INJURYwise

Top 3 car accident FAQs

There are several questions that personal injury lawyers get asked over and over again. This month's column sets out the top three questions I get asked with respect to car accidents.

FAQ #1 – ICBC was paying for my physiotherapy/massage therapy/chiropractic treatments and now they have cut me off, are they allowed to do that?

Answer: It depends on why they are cutting you off. ICBC is required to pay for all reasonable expenses incurred by you as a result of your injury for necessary medical, surgical, dental, hospital, ambulance or professional nursing services, or for necessary physical therapy, chiropractic treatment, occupational therapy or speech therapy or for prosthesis or orthosis (orthopedic appliance or apparatus). ICBC is not required to pay for more than 12 physiotherapy treatments unless, before the additional treatment is given, ICBC’s medical advisor or your medical practitioner certifies to ICBC in writing that the treatment is necessary. ICBC can also terminate your Accident Benefits if they request you attend a medical examination and you refuse. While Massage Therapy is not specifically included in the Regulation, the case law confirms that it is included in physical therapy.

Bottom line: if the treatment is reasonable and necessary and there is sufficient evidence to support that conclusion, ICBC is required to continue paying.

FAQ #2 – I have been told the other driver has no insurance, can I still make a personal injury claim?

Answer: Yes. Under the Insurance (Vehicle) Act, there is coverage up to $200,000 for BC residents who have been injured in a motor vehicle accident by an uninsured driver or a hit-and-run driver. If ICBC settles the claim with you or they are required to pay a judgment they will pursue the amount paid out from the uninsured driver (assuming they can identify the other driver).

FAQ #3 – My vehicle can be repaired but I believe that it is no longer worth the same amount as it was before the accident, am I entitled to the difference in value?

Answer: It depends on the facts. The case law states that it can not be assumed that every vehicle that is in an accident and repaired is worth less than it was before the accident. As a result, in order to be compensated for the alleged difference in value (also called accelerated depreciation), you must be able to prove that: 1) your vehicle is worth less than it was before the accident and 2) the reason for the decrease in value is due to the accident (see Squire v. ICBC (1990) 44 BCLR (2d) 65 (CA)).

Have a personal injury question you want answered? Send me an email [email protected] or give me a call at 250.979.2512. Comments or suggestions for future articles are always welcome.

Important Note: The information contained in this column should not be treated by readers as legal advice and should not be relied on without detailed legal counsel being sought.

This article is written by or on behalf of an outsourced columnist and does not necessarily reflect the views of Castanet.



More INJURYwise articles

About the Author

Keri Grenier is an experienced personal injury lawyer based at Murphy Battista LLP's Kelowna office. She also holds a B.A. in psychology. Her practice focuses on helping people who have been injured in motor vehicle accidents or due to the negligence of others.

In her column, Keri provides practical information about personal injury claims in a format that is simple and easy to understand.

Email: [email protected]

Website: http://www.murphybattista.com
 

Twitter:  http://twitter.com/KelownaLawyer



242496
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



251496