233567
234217
Dan-in-Ottawa

Trudeau's Liberal challenges

Justin Trudeau’s government faces added challenges as the House of Commons enters the final few weeks before the summer adjournment and the final scheduled sitting before the election in October.

As the government attempts to prioritize bills it would like to see passed through the House, those bills must also pass through the Senate.

This has become more challenging in recent times as the Senate has demonstrated an increased willingness to amend or attempt to delay some bills.

One of those bills currently before the Senate is Bill C-48.

Bill C-48 is called the “Oil Tanker Moratorium Act” and it applies exclusively to coastal B.C.- more precisely the north coast.

I will share some of my own concerns with this bill.

First, is the inherent contradiction of this proposed legislation.

Mr. Trudeau is proposing to increase the tanker traffic off the west coast with the Trans-Mountain pipeline expansion project.

It is the north coast where he is proposing to ban all oil tankers.

Many have pointed out the contrast in acknowledging risk in one geographic region, and yet ignoring that same potential for risk in another region.

From a safety perspective, the Western Canada Marine Response Corporation can provide spill response service in both geographic regions.

Likewise the Pacific Pilotage Authority, a Crown corporation, can also provide the same world-respected marine pilots to navigate these vessels in both regions.

Companies such as Seaspan (as an example) can also provide multiple tugboats to assist with docking and escort services in both areas.

In other words the same safety conditions the prime minister trusts in one geographic region can be equally provided in another.

So why a proposed ban in one region and not the other?

The simple answer is politics, and this is where the Senate, currently debating Bill C-48, has weighed in.

As CBC Reports, a Senate committee investing this bill has concluded that “the bill is a cynical, intentional bid to cripple the economy of Prairie provinces, particularly Alberta, and curry political favour elsewhere in the country.”

The same CBC report further states this is “driven by the calculation that the ruling Liberals have few seats to lose in Alberta and Saskatchewan.”

I will note the Liberals currently have three seats in Alberta, and one in Saskatchewan compared to 17 in B.C.

It should also be pointed out that 30 different First Nation bands have joined together to launch a lawsuit to stop this tanker ban from going forward.

They call this proposed tanker ban an unjustified infringement of their aboriginal rights and title.

They point out that this proposed tanker plan would thwart their ability to create economic support for their community through the development of an oil export facility.

At the moment, it remains unclear how the entire Senate will vote on the Senate Transportation and Communications committee recommendation to kill Bill C-48.

My question for you this week:

  • Do you support Bill C-48 and the moratorium on oil tanker traffic off the North coast?

This article is written by or on behalf of an outsourced columnist and does not necessarily reflect the views of Castanet.



More Dan in Ottawa articles

234644
About the Author

Dan Albas is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola and the co-chair of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations.

Before entering public life, Dan was the owner of Kick City Martial Arts, responsible for training hundreds of men, women and youth to bring out their best.

Dan  is consistently recognized as one of Canada’s top 10 most active Members of Parliament on Twitter (@danalbas) and also continues to write a weekly column published in many local newspapers and on this website.

Dan welcomes comments, questions and concerns from citizens and is often available to speak to groups and organizations on matters of federal concern. 

He can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-800-665-8711.



The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



234154


235944