59999
133164
Dan-in-Ottawa

PM breaks another promise

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the federal Liberals have ticked off another item on their bucket list of broken promises.

They set the stage for the latest on Tuesday night in Ottawa. With only three hours notice, the Liberal government invited parliamentarians for a technical presentation on the upcoming 2017 Budget Implementation Act, also known as the BIA.

Once I arrived for the presentation, it became very clear the reasons why. In spite of promising Canadians that the Liberal government would not use omnibus legislation, the new Liberal BIA is a textbook example of an omnibus bill.

An omnibus bill is legislation that seeks to amend, repeal or enact several Acts, and is often characterized by the fact that it has a multiple number of separate initiatives that may be only loosely connected to the actual intent of the original bill, in this case the budget.

As an example, in this Liberal BIA, it is proposed to weaken the independence of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (known in Ottawa as the PBO), a measure not related to the spending of funds outlined in the budget but rather a measure by the Liberals to weaken scrutiny of the spending.

A disappointing but not surprising result given that the Liberals have been embarrassed by the PBO’s previous reports that famously exposed Liberal efforts to manipulate and hide the fact that they inherited a balanced budget from the previous Conservative government or the recent PBO report revealing the Liberal`s slow and disjointed infrastructure spending. 

Critics oppose omnibus bills arguing that with so much widely varied content an omnibus bill cannot receive the required parliamentary scrutiny for the many varied clauses. 

Another criticism is that some measures within an omnibus bill may be widely supported but other measures may be strongly opposed. In this case, weakening the independence of the PBO would never stand as a single bill however it can more easily slip through in an omnibus bill where it will receive less scrutiny.

While the criticism against omnibus bills is certainly valid and should not be overlooked, I believe there is also another perspective that is deserving of consideration. A government in challenging economic times has an obligation to enact as many measures as it believes is reasonably required to continue to build a stronger and more prosperous Canada. 

Within any legislative or parliamentary precinct there is a limited amount of time available that can also be subject to opposition delay tactics.

Government`s propose many of these measures because it believes they are beneficial to the citizens it collectively represents. In my view it is not unreasonable to use an omnibus bill for the purposes of enacting broad based legislation in areas supporting the economy, public safety, the environment or trade as a few examples.

In this case, I am not faulting the Liberal government for using an omnibus budget bill such as this. Where I do take issue with the Liberals is that they committed to Canadians they would not use omnibus bills.

They promised they would outright change the House rules to technically eliminate them.

It was the Liberals choice to promise this during the election and their choice to table such a bill, regardless whether our rules allow for them or not.

As with the promise to enact electoral reform or to return to a balanced budget by 2019, Canadians are witnessing a disturbing pattern of broken promises that were made to Canadians by this Liberal Government with little to no regard for keeping those promises.

For a government that promised “better was always possible," I would submit a pattern of broken promises only serves to undermine our democratic process and increase cynicism among voters, and on that note, I believe this Liberal government can do better.

My question this week: Do you support the limited use of omnibus bills or should they be prohibited as the Liberals promised?

I can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free 1-800-665-8711.  

COMMENTS WELCOME

Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.



More Dan in Ottawa articles

133565
About the Author

Dan Albas, Conservative member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola, is the shadow minister of innovation, science, economic development and internal trade, and sits on the standing committee on finance.

Before entering public life, Dan was the owner of Kick City Martial Arts, responsible for training hundreds of men, women and youth to bring out their best.

In British Columbia, Dan has been consistently one of the lowest spending MPs on office and administration related costs despite operating two offices to better serve local constituents.

Dan is consistently recognized as one of Canada’s top 10 most active members of Parliament on Twitter (@danalbas) and continues to write a weekly column published in many local newspapers and on this website.

He can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-800-665-8711.



59170
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



52157


57458