Senators take rare stand

Canadians tend not to hear much in the media about our Senate unless it involves a spending scandal. 

This week, a group of Conservative senators made the rare and unusual decision to amend a government spending bill.

During the last election, the Liberal promised to reduce income taxes on the middle class that ultimately would be revenue neutral as a result of income taxes being increased on citizens who earn over $200,000 per year. 

Credit to the Liberal Government as they have been in the process of enacting some of their electoral promises however it has been done in a manner that some take disagreement with that ultimately has resulted in the Senator amendment in question.

One challenge in enacting tax cuts for the middle class is defining who exactly is the “middle class” from the perspective of the Liberal Government.

 In this case, many were surprised that the proposed tax cuts for the middle class did not apply to most in need — Canadians earning below $45,000 per year. 

More surprising was that the same middle class tax cuts also applied to citizens earning between $100,000 up to $199,000 per year. 

I have yet to hear any citizens supporting a tax cut for citizens earning close to $200,000 annually. 

As it turns out, when citizens in the $100,000 to $199,000 income level are included in the ‘middle class’ tax cut it turns out the plan is not in fact revenue neutral as was promised. 

Overall the cost of the Liberal middle class tax results in an annual deficit ranging between $1.2 Billion and possibly as high as $1.7 billion each year. 

As the annual budget is currently forecasting deficits for the duration of the Liberal Government term these tax cuts are in fact unsustainable– this is where the Conservative Senator`s amendment comes in.

Ultimately, the amendment from Senator Larry Smith proposes to eliminate the tax cut for citizens earning above $ 90,000 so those earning $100,000 up to $199,000 would no longer see an income tax cut if the amendment was adopted.  

The amendment further proposes to increase the tax cut for those earning between $45,000 up to $53,000 and would keep the existing tax cut for those earning between $53,000 up to $90,000. 

It should also be noted that this amendment is also revenue neutral meaning that it would not add an additional $1.2-$1.7 billion in new debt annually. 

It’s unclear if the Senate will support this amendment however it will provide a test for those newly appointed non-partisan senators to see if they blindly vote against this amendment in favour of the original government bill or not. 

In the event the Senate does pass this amendment it would return to the House of Commons for a vote from elected MPs. 

My question to citizens is what are your thoughts on this amendment? Does it make sense to increase the income tax cut for lower income citizens and eliminate the income tax cut for those earning between $90,000 up to $190,000 and eliminate the deficit created by this in the process? 

Or should un-elected Senators oppose the amendment and support the Liberals tax cut as is, given that it was a campaign promise that provided a mandate for these changes, despite not being revenue neutral as was promised.

I welcome your comments, questions and concerns on this subject or any other before the House of Commons.

I can be reached at [email protected] or toll free 1-800-665-8711.  


Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.

More Dan in Ottawa articles

About the Author

Dan Albas, Conservative member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola, is the shadow minister of innovation, science, economic development and internal trade, and sits on the standing committee on finance.

Before entering public life, Dan was the owner of Kick City Martial Arts, responsible for training hundreds of men, women and youth to bring out their best.

In British Columbia, Dan has been consistently one of the lowest spending MPs on office and administration related costs despite operating two offices to better serve local constituents.

Dan is consistently recognized as one of Canada’s top 10 most active members of Parliament on Twitter (@danalbas) and continues to write a weekly column published in many local newspapers and on this website.

He can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-800-665-8711.

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories