No playing in the street

I grew up in a small town 50 years ago where the residential street we lived on was treated as an extension of the front yard by all the neighbourhood kids.

This is where we met to ride bicycles, play 500 up, street hockey, kick the can and almost everything else that we wanted to do.

The rules were simple, if a car came, you got off the street until it went by and the driver drove at a responsible speed.

We shared.

During my policing career, I sometimes got a complaint about youth doing the same thing I used to do. My preferred solution was to gather them all together and remind them that drivers were not good at sharing and they should be keeping an eye out for them.

When a vehicle approached, they were to move off the road until it had passed  I probably didn't have to go back and talk to them again.

Today, it seems that in some residential areas, roads are only for motor vehicles. A strata property in Chemainus is considering a use-of-roadways bylaw amendment that reads: 

  •     3(6) Any use of a roadway for any purpose other than access to and from strata lots and, where permitted, for parking is prohibited. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a roadway may not be used for play, including hockey, baseball, basketball, skateboarding, chalk artistry, bicycling or other sports and recreational activities.

The strata vice-president said the bylaw started innocently after several close calls about children’s safety on the street.

It's interesting to note that the proposed "solution" places the onus squarely on the children and their parents, not on the drivers in the community. No need to share here.

The older children in this community do have room to roam in a place that is not paved, but, here is no park or dedicated play area evident on the property, at least not looking at it using Google Earth.

What happens when you live in the city? Playing Out is a parent-and-resident-led movement restoring children’s freedom to play out in the streets and spaces where they live, for their health, happiness and sense of belonging.

The organization is based in Bristol, Eng.

Our Motor Vehicle Act regulates pedestrians using roads in our province. It sets out rules for interaction in traffic and when crossing the street. Section 182 essentially confines a pedestrian to the edges of the roadway or sidewalk when they are not crossing.

It also gives the authority to municipalities to create bylaws that provide for "the regulation or prohibition of pedestrian traffic on highways other than at crosswalks."

For instance, the City of Vancouver prohibits the use of a street for "any sport, amusement, exercise or occupation on a street that obstructs, impedes, or interferes with the passage of vehicles or pedestrians," in section 67 of the Street and Traffic Bylaw.

The only group I can think of that uses our roads in any way they please with impunity are political protesters.

What's wrong with this picture?

Story URL: https://www.drivesmartbc.ca/pedestrians/no-playing-street


Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.

More Behind the Wheel articles

About the Author

Tim Schewe is a retired constable with many years of traffic law enforcement experience. He has been writing his column for most of the 20 years of his service in the RCMP.

The column was 'The Beat Goes On' in Fort St. John, 'Traffic Tips' in the South Okanagan and now 'Behind the Wheel' on Vancouver Island and here on Castanet.net.

Schewe retired from the force in January of 2006, but the column has become a habit, and continues.

To comment, please email

To learn more, visit DriveSmartBC

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories