156834
Achieving-Justice

Brainwashed over texting

Reader comments compelled me to write a follow-up to my column about the idiocy of our distracted driving laws.

There were a lot. And I wouldn’t want to leave my fan base hanging!

Actually, the comments were overwhelmingly negative, but sifting through those calling me and my ideas idiotic, skewed in judgment, half-backed, crazy, junk, garbage, pointless and vitriolic BS, I identified two themes that that I feel compelled to address.

One is about the level of government intervention in our lives.

One accused me of lobbying government “to stick their noses into MORE of our lives.” Another: “Laws are there to keep the sheep in line.”  Others: “Nanny state” and “You can’t change stupid!”

I agree that government shouldn’t be sticking their nose where it doesn’t belong.

But stick their nose in they did. And in the worst way.

At a time when cellphone use was exploding and the driving public was starting to realize that we should leave our phones alone, they misled drivers into believing that hands-free use was safe. Their idiotic law increased, instead of decreased, overall cellphone use while driving. And they doubled down on it, twice.

The only benefactor to the law, and they won big, was the hands-free technology industry.

The rest of us lost in increased health care expense, soaring insurance rates and very real personal losses.

Two wrongs don’t make a right. But there’s 10 years of damage that needs to be repaired. And I don’t see an alternative repair than very directly attacking the false perception that hands-free use is safe.

Another theme is the perception that “looking down and texting” is the real problem, and that the law banning hand-held cellphone use was enacted to stop that dangerous behaviour.

It is a prevalent and understandable perception. We can easily get our heads around the danger of taking our eyes off the road. It is less easy to grasp how there could be a danger when we are looking out of the windshield.

And our “distracted driving” laws have reinforced that perception.

There is no reference to that rationale in the discussion paper our government put together (and ignored) to inform their cellphone laws.

Worse, it turns out that “looking down and texting” is no worse than voice to text.

The two were compared in an April 2013 study: An evaluation of the effectiveness of voice-to-text programs at reducing incidences of distracted driving. The abstract notes: “Results indicate that driver reaction times were nearly two times slower than the baseline condition, no matter which texting method was used.” A quote from the executive summary: “These findings suggest that using voice-to-text applications to send and receive text messages while driving do not increase driver safety compared to manual texting.”

Here is a helpful video explaining the study.

And here is a link to infographics provided by the United States National Safety Council, one of which notes: “New studies show using voice-to-text is more distracting than typing texts by hand.” I have requested copies of the studies referred to. E-mail me if you would like me to share them.

The idiotic law has entrenched the dangerous and false message that hands free is safe, and that “looking down and texting” is the worst evil.

And drivers have been brainwashed to such an extent that a columnist exposing the clear science against those perceptions is subjected to name calling.

It is critically important that drivers learn that there is no benefit to using hands free technology. Please read the materials I have referenced and watch the video. And please share this important information with others.

COMMENTS WELCOME

Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.



More Achieving Justice articles

153308
About the Author

Paul Hergott began practicing law in 1995, in a general litigation practice. Of the various areas of litigation, he became most drawn to, and passionate about, pursuing fair compensation for injured victims. This gradually became his exclusive area of practice.

In 2007, Paul opened Hergott Law, a boutique personal injury law firm in the Central Interior, serving personal injury clients from all over British Columbia. Paul’s practice is restricted to acting only for the injured victim, never for ICBC or for other insurance companies.

Paul became a weekly newspaper columnist in January of 2007, when his first column entitled “It’s not about screwing the Insurance Company” was published. 

Please feel free to email or call Paul (1.855.437.4688) with legal issues you might like him to write about in his column, or to offer your feedback about something he has written.

Email:   [email protected]
Firm website:  www.hlaw.ca
Achieving Justice Legal Blog:  http://www.hlaw.ca/category/all-columns/
One Crash is Too Many Road Safety Campaign: www.onecrashistoomany.com
Google Plus:  https://plus.google.com/+HlawCanada/posts
Facebook:  www.facebook.com/personalinjurylawfirm
Twitter:   twitter.com/Hergott_Law



157072
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories