231260
The-Last-Word

Watch for careless drivers

There’s a sweet, environmental justice when congested traffic slows and cycling commuters are able to gain ground.

But there’s also considerable danger.

This is the third of a four-part series highlighting motorist and cyclist collision scenarios. My hope is that with a heightened awareness of common collision scenarios, motorists and cyclists alike might better anticipate and avoid them.

Two collision scenarios arise when cyclists overtake motorists. The most common is the right turning motorist, clueless about the overtaking cyclist.

There’s no excuse.

We don’t blindly move between vehicle lanes without checking our mirrors and shoulder checking. Why don’t we, as a matter of course, do the same thing before moving across the area of the road commonly occupied by cyclists?

But the law favours motorists. Even in the case of designated bicycle lanes.

And did you know that a cyclist is actually prohibited from overtaking a vehicle unless the cyclist is within their own lane (bicycle lane or otherwise)?

Section 158 of the Motor Vehicle Act contains a general prohibition against passing on the right unless you are within your own lane.

Section 183, which imposes cyclists with “the same rights and duties as a driver of a vehicle," applies that prohibition to them.

Does that sound nonsensical?  Imagine cycling along a highway, on a wide shoulder. Congested traffic slows and then stops. The law technically prohibits you from continuing along, cycling past the stopped traffic.

Our Court of Appeal in Ormiston v. ICBC, 2014 BCCA 276, discusses that issue. A van had come to an unexplained stop on a roadway, leaving about three feet between the passenger side of the van and the fog line.

A 16-year-old cyclist came up behind the stopped van and proceeded to pass along the shoulder of the road. The van abruptly moved to the shoulder, forcing the cyclist to swerve off the roadway to avoid a collision.

The cyclist was found 100 per cent at fault for his own injuries.

The court’s analysis with regard to the prohibition of a cyclist passing on the right:

“While I doubt the legislative intention was to create by this somewhat convoluted statutory route what would be thousands of miles of unmarked and ill-defined bicycle lanes across the province, I do not consider s. 158 (1)(b) constitutes an applicable exception to the prohibition against passing on the right in any event.

"As defined, the exception applies to a laned roadway being a roadway divided into marked lanes for vehicles travelling in the same direction.The markings divide the roadway; the lanes marked are on the roadway. A roadway does not include the shoulder. The shoulder could not be an unobstructed lane on a laned roadway.

"The “laned roadway” exception has, as the judge said, no application here. It does not permit cyclists to pass vehicles on the right by riding on the shoulder.”

Even if you are within a dedicated lane, permitted to pass on the right, section 158(2)(a) puts an onus on you to ensure that overtaking the slowed or stopped traffic can be done safely.

An example of section 158(2)(a) in action is the case of Nelson v. Lafarge Canada Inc., 2013 BCSC 1552. The cyclist, described as riding “hard and fast”, had been riding alongside a cement truck as they both approached a green light at a Vancouver intersection.

The cyclist was in his own lane, the curb lane. He was seriously injured when he was struck by the front grill of the cement truck as it turned right.

The two had been approaching the intersection side by side, but as the truck slowed in preparation for making the right turn, the cyclist was overtaking the truck, bringing section 158(2)(a) into applicability.

The trial judge found the truck driver ought to have kept a more vigilant lookout, so as to notice the cyclist. And also that as a commercial truck driver he was “…obliged to exercise great caution when approaching, preparing for and executing a right turn on a green light at the intersection…."

But the cyclist was assessed 65 per cent at fault. The words of the trial judge:

“In balancing blameworthiness, I find Mr. Nelson's conduct constituted a significant departure from the requisite standard of care which created a risk of serious harm. He was aware of the truck travelling eastbound on his left but focused only on his own path forward and did not check for an activated right turn signal, which was there to be seen.

"Instead, he tried to pass the truck on the right without first determining whether such a movement could be made safely. In my view, such conduct was very careless.”

What lessons can be learned from these scenarios?

Lessons for cyclists: As glorious as it is to overtake vehicle traffic, a clueless motorist might turn into you, or directly across your path. And as unfair as it might seem, the law is against you even when within a designated bicycle lane.

Lessons for motorists: These collisions would be eliminated if motorists simply kept a vigilant look-out for the vulnerable cyclists we share the roads with. Every time you move to your right, check your mirrors and shoulder check, expecting that a cyclist might be there.

This article is written by or on behalf of an outsourced columnist and does not necessarily reflect the views of Castanet.

COMMENTS WELCOME

Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.



More The Last Word articles

228621
About the Author

Lawyer Paul Hergott began writing as a columnist in January 2007. 

Achieving Justice, based on Paul’s personal injury practice at the time, focused on injury claims and road safety.  It was published weekly for 13½ years until July 2020, when his busy legal practice no longer left time for writing.

Paul was able to pick up writing again in January 2024. After transitioning his practice to estate administration and management.

Paul’s intention is to write primarily about end of life and estate related matters, but he is very easily distracted by other topics.

You are encouraged to contact Paul directly at [email protected] with legal questions and issues you would like him to write about.



230874
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



230091