253572
261499
How many months of rent compensation should a tenant in B.C. receive if their rental agreement is broken for a renovation or redevelopment?
1 month (provincial minimum) 
17.84%
2 months 
11.64%
3 months 
25.6%
6 months 
21.59%
More than 6 months 
13.72%
None 
9.61%
Total Votes:  7836

How many months of rent compensation should a tenant in B.C. receive if their rental agreement is broken for a renovation or redevelopment?

Poll: Renter protection

Kelowna city council has given the green light to new tenant protection measures aimed at supporting renters during redevelopment projects.

But in doing so, it dropped a key recommended provision that would have seen developers able to avoid paying evicted tenants an extra two months' rent if the vacancy rate is greater than four per cent at the time of the eviction.

Councillors approved the measures in a 7-1 vote, with only Coun. Ron Cannan opposing the measures.

A previous tenant city staff-recommended relocation package presented a month ago to council was panned as being too vague, lacking structure and definitive guidelines.

Both the previous proposal and the one approved Monday by council require developers to submit a tenant protection plan, but the first proposal did not include specifics as to what that plan would have to contain.

The new version contains more specific measures, including financial considerations and a specific tenant protection plan.

Tenant protection measures will only apply to properties containing five or more rental homes and to those redevelopments resulting in tenant rental agreements being terminated.

Developers will be required to submit tenant protection plans, which will be guided by standardized terms of reference provided by the city.

Each plan will be required to include:

• Information about how the applicant’s obligations under the Residential Tenancy Act are being met.

• Information about how the applicant’s obligations under the city’s new Tenant Protection Bylaw are being met.

• Information about any voluntary, additional proposals by the applicant respecting protection and relocation of tenants during redevelopment.

Other key elements include compensation equivalent to three months' rent, four months’ notice and $1,000 to help cover a tenant’s moving expenses. Those measures align with council priorities for affordable housing and homelessness prevention.

City staff recommended developers be required to pay a tenant three months' rent to break a rental agreement—one month required under provincial law and an additional two if Kelowna's rental vacancy rate was below four per cent.

Developers could also avoid paying the extra two months if the tenant agreed to relocate to another unit that the property owner had and the new rent there was no more than 10 per cent higher than the original rent they were paying.

Coun. Luke Stack wanted the provision tying the extra two months' rent to the vacancy rate removed, saying with rents so much higher today than they were in the past, any long-time renters were “protected” by provincially controlled rent increases. They would, however, have to find new accommodation and would face much higher rents. So, he argued, anyone forced out due to a redevelopment should get three months' rent back regardless of the vacancy rate.

A vacancy rate of between three and five per cent is considered healthy for a city.

Read more

Have an opinion? Send it to [email protected]



Previous Polls

April 28, 2025 - 7517 votes
In light of increasing use of vehicles as deadly weapons in crowds, does security need to be increased at public gatherings in your community?

Yes: 5204
No: 1885
Unsure: 428

April 26, 2025 - 25064 votes
Who are you voting for in the federal election?

Liberal: 11706
Conservative: 10940
NDP: 1121
Greens: 154
Other: 465
Don't intend to vote: 678

April 24, 2025 - 10056 votes
Should Canada accept invitation to team up with China in opposition to U.S. tariffs?

Yes: 4899
No: 4042
Unsure: 1115

April 23, 2025 - 8065 votes
Do endorsements of political candidates by well-known people or former politicians make any difference to how you plan to vote?

Yes: 556
No: 7387
Don't plan to vote: 122

April 22, 2025 - 10166 votes
Did you vote in an advance poll for the federal election?

Yes: 7199
No: 2967





Previous Poll Results

In light of increasing use of vehicles as deadly weapons in crowds, does security need to be increased at public gatherings in your community?

Total Votes:  7517
Yes: 
69.23%
No: 
25.08%
Unsure: 
5.69%

» Previous Polls

Have an idea for a poll question?
Email us [email protected]


257509
248082
244599
259846