Wednesday, December 17th0.4°C
24562
24516

Mom guilty of killing kids

Jurors in the murder trial of a mother who fatally shot her two teenage children had to decide between two scenarios: the prosecution's argument that Julie Schenecker knew what she was doing when she aimed a .38-calibre handgun loaded with hollow-point bullets at her children's heads; or the defence's explanation that the former military linguist was legally insane at the time.

After two weeks of lengthy testimony, it took the jury less than two hours to convict the 53-year-old of first-degree murder in the January 2011 killings. She was sentenced soon after to two life terms.

Schenecker, dressed in a grey suit and pink button-down shirt, began to cry after the verdict was announced. But before she was fingerprinted and led away, she turned to the courtroom to utter the only words the public would hear from her.

"I apologize for what happened, what I did," she said, crying. "I take responsibility. I was there. I know. I know I shot my son and daughter. I don't know why, but I have time to try to understand that."

In the rambling statement, there was one person Schenecker didn't address specifically or apologize to by name: her ex-husband Parker Schenecker, father of the slain 13-year-old Beau and 16-year-old Calyx.

If Parker Schenecker noticed that, he didn't mention it when he talked to the news media in the courthouse following the trial.

"Today's decision for many reasons gives my family a great relief," he said.

Six expert witnesses for the defence had described Schenecker as a mentally ill woman with bipolar disorder, depression and psychotic episodes.

But prosecutor Jay Pruner spent his closing arguments describing a calculating woman who plotted to buy the gun, waited three days for a background check and detailed her thoughts about the killings in a journal beforehand.

She killed the children, he said, because she was angry at her husband, Parker Schenecker — a career military man who was deployed in the Middle East when the killings took place. Pruner said Schenecker was angry that her husband had left her in a rehab facility over Thanksgiving and that he wanted to curtail her drinking.

Throughout the trial, Pruner relied on Schenecker's journals as evidence of premeditation.

"I could have done this anytime," Schenecker wrote to her husband. "But luckily you weren't here. I might have taken you out too. That would have been a crying shame."

Pruner added his own opinion: "What does that tell you? It not only tells you about the anger and resentment she has but it tells you, ironically, that Parker Schenecker was probably safer in the Middle East than he was in a bed next to her."

Parker Schenecker sat in the courtroom for all of the testimony, and testified twice — once for the prosecution and once for the defence.

He showed little emotion throughout the trial, except for a few wan smiles when talking about his children while on the witness stand. He sat next to his mother during the trial, while Julie's family sat on the other side of the courtroom, behind the defence table.

The couple, who had been married for 20 years, divorced in 2011 following the shootings.

The Canadian Press

COMMENTS WELCOME

Comments on this story are pre-moderated and approval times may vary. Before they appear, comments are reviewed by moderators to ensure they meet our submission guidelines. Keep it clean, keep it civil, keep it truthful, stay on topic and be responsible. Comments are open and welcome for three days after the story is published. We reserve the right to close comments before then. Comments that appear on the site are not the opinion of Castanet, but only of the comment writer.



Read more World News

23015


Recent Trending



23744

22922

23841


24111



World Quick Links World Discussion Forum
United Nations
World Health Organization
UNESCO
World Trade Organization
NATO
European Union
The Commonwealth
Francophonie
Olympics
Google Earth


Member of BC Press Council


22842