Letters to the editor
Covenant alternatives |
|
|
To the editor:
Why does City Council seem bound and determined to break the Simpson Covenant?
The Interior Health could acquire property outside of the downtown, on a transit route where people even without a car could reach it.
There is property along Springfield east of the Fortis building even the corner of Benvoulin either of which would support a multi storey building along with it’s own parking.
There are also several areas in Rutland which would help that area by increasing business which it could certainly handle.
I thought when Interior Health acquired the Burnett family property across from Cottonwoods several years ago that their intention was to build a building which would house all their spread out entities and have them under one roof near a transit line and with it’s own parking.
All they have done there is bring in portables for office space and park mostly on the street.
City Hall needs to get off this tact of battling what our kind forefathers tried to do for our fair city and spread things out.
Len Jupp |
|
|
Posted:
Oct 26, 2012 / 5:00 am Story# 82390 / Contributed |
|
| top | |
Read more Letters to the editor
letters@castanet.net

for these and other issues.
- Tolko Death Jun 18
- Cristy Clark - how disapointing is that. Jun 18
- Summerland - Designer surveys Jun 18
- Vet responds to Chuck Poulsen Jun 18
- A question to the mayor Jun 13


(Click for RSS instructions.)











