$5.6M will melt away

I was not planning on mentioning the controversy surrounding a temporary ice rink the Liberal government built in front of the Parliament buildings to celebrate Canada 150.
However, a Liberal MP referred to this rink and defended the project against allegations of government waste.

Unfortunately, the member of Parliament in question failed to mention the costs to build this temporary rink. That omission of relevant fact led to many citizens asking me what was cost. 
Originally, the cost to build this temporary ice rink was quoted at $5.6 million. The rink will only be open for three weeks in December. Later, it will be donated to a community near Ottawa.

The public outcry over the costs in addition to the limited schedule led to an announcement extending the opening schedule to the end of February 2018.

However, the extra costs of doing so are not clear.

I will leave it up to local citizens to decide if $5.6 million, plus additional costs not known, is money well spent for a temporary skating rink outside the House of Commons.
I have received a considerable response from many single parents, the majority of whom are single mothers, who have encountered serious difficulty in dealing with the Canada Revenue Agency.

These single parents are having their Canada Child Benefit arbitrarily denied, reduced or clawed back. I will credit the minister of National Revenue's office who has reached out and to date we have been able to successfully restore the benefits for one local single mother.

I am working on a number of other cases. 

It is important to give credit where it is due and on behalf of my constituents, I appreciate the assistance of the minister`s office in these matters.
On a somewhat related theme, the House of Commons will adjourn this week.

Earlier today, the finance minister revealed details of the Liberal government tax changes affecting Canadian small businesses, effective Jan.1.

I am concerned over the timing of this announcement, being so close to the holiday season. Last year, the Liberals quietly released a report on Christmas Eve showing they would not balance the budget until at least 2050.
What is more concerning is these small business tax changes will add more discretionary power to the Canada Revenue Agency in areas such as the dividends to family members, who help run those small businesses.

My greatest concern relates to the experience I have encountered with single parents and how unfairly the CRA may use their discretionary power. This could lead to the CRA unfairly penalizing Canadian small business owners without proof of any actual wrong doing.
I have witnessed many examples where citizens do provide the required documentation only to be arbitrarily denied again by the CRA.

While I do appreciate the minister of national revenue's efforts, it is not practical to have the minister`s office continue to intervene on a case by case basis for what should not be a problem in the first place.
This leads to my question for this week:

  • Do you believe the Canada Revenue Agency should have ultimate and sole authority when interpreting the status of information reported by taxpayers? By extension, should there be a greater burden of proof required from the CRA before they can arbitrarily and adversely impact a taxpayer?


Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.

More Dan in Ottawa articles

About the Author

Dan Albas, Conservative member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola, is the shadow minister of innovation, science, economic development and internal trade, and sits on the standing committee on finance.

Before entering public life, Dan was the owner of Kick City Martial Arts, responsible for training hundreds of men, women and youth to bring out their best.

In British Columbia, Dan has been consistently one of the lowest spending MPs on office and administration related costs despite operating two offices to better serve local constituents.

Dan is consistently recognized as one of Canada’s top 10 most active members of Parliament on Twitter (@danalbas) and continues to write a weekly column published in many local newspapers and on this website.

He can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-800-665-8711.

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories