From child porn, to lawyer

Photo: Contributed

A Canadian-born man who was jailed in Florida for viewing child pornography has been granted permission to practise law in Ontario.

The tribunal of the Law Society of Upper Canada ruled in a written decision last week to grant Ronald Ori Davidovic's application to be licensed as a lawyer, saying he has demonstrated he is now "of good character."

The document says Davidovic, who was born in Montreal and moved to Miami with his family as a child, was working as general counsel for a telecommunications company in Florida when he was arrested in early 2004 following a police search of his home.

The decision says investigators seized his computers, where they found images and videos of children and teenagers as well as regular pornography.

Davidovic pleaded guilty to one count of receiving images containing a visual depiction of minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct and was sentenced to five years in prison, which was later knocked down to three years. He is also registered as a sex offender in Florida.

He resigned from the Florida bar but would have been allowed to reapply in 2010. Instead, the tribunal's decision says, he applied to practice in Ontario, saying he planned to move to Toronto, where he has family.

Two members of the three-person tribunal panel ruled that Davidovic should be licensed, saying he has taken responsibility and expressed remorse for his actions, and has not reoffended since his arrest.

Davidovic, who is in his 40s, has completed more than 300 hours of mandated therapy and more than 500 hours of additional therapy, and started volunteering with an organization that educates media, legislators and the public about issues relating to sex offenders, they said.

"It has been over 13 years since the commission of the offences, and nine years since the applicant completed his sentence. He has tried to reinvent himself, with a significant measure of success thus far, to make a new life," Raj Anand and Jan Richardson wrote.

"The applicant's conduct in the years preceding 2004 was reprehensible, but it is not an automatic or permanent bar to his admission, given the evidence and positions of the parties, and in light of the applicant’s determination to be an ethical and productive lawyer."