Sunday, March 29th11.3°C
25657

PG&E pleads not guilty to obstruction, other charges in deadly gas explosion in California

SAN FRANCISCO - Pacific Gas & Electric Co. pleaded not guilty Monday to charges in a new indictment that accuses the utility of lying to federal investigators looking into a fatal pipeline explosion in a San Francisco Bay Area neighbourhood.

Steve Bauer, an attorney for the company, entered the plea in federal court to all 28 counts, including obstruction of justice. The new indictment — announced last month — replaced a 12-count indictment that related to PG&E's safety practices but did not include an obstruction charge.

Prosecutors say PG&E tried to mislead federal investigators about pipeline testing and maintenance procedures it was following at the time of the 2010 explosion in the city of San Bruno and for six months afterward.

The blast killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes.

The utility was operating under a company policy that did not meet federal safety standards, failing to prioritize as high-risk and properly assess many of its oldest natural gas pipelines, prosecutors said.

PG&E said in a statement on Monday that the obstruction charge stems from a paperwork error that the company quickly corrected.

"We are confident the legal process will ensure all of the facts are fully reviewed. In the meantime, we want all of our customers to know that we will stay focused on transforming this 100-plus-year-old natural gas system into the safest and most reliable in the country," the company said.

The other charges accuse the utility of failing to act on threats in its pipeline system even after the problems were identified by its own inspectors. The indictment charges PG&E with keeping shoddy records, failing to identify safety threats and failing to act when threats were found.

PG&E said Monday that employees did not intentionally violate the federal Pipeline Safety Act and even when there were mistakes, "employees were acting in good faith to provide customers with safe and reliable energy."

The new charges expose PG&E to more than $1 billion in fines. It had faced up to a $6 million fine under the old indictment.

In addition, the utility is facing lawsuits and $2.5 billion in civil fines from regulators, including the state Public Utilities Commission.

San Bruno officials said they have asked federal prosecutors to request the appointment of an independent monitor to oversee PG&E and its state regulators as part of any penalty against the company.

The Canadian Press


Read more Business News




Recent Trending




Today's Market
S&P TSX14812.42-57.38
S&P CDNX681.43+1.87
DJIA17712.66+34.43
Nasdaq4891.22+27.86
S&P 5002061.02+4.87
CDN Dollar0.7928-0.0082
Gold1196.30-8.80
Oil48.43-3.00
Lumber282.60-3.60
Natural Gas2.62-0.05

 
Okanagan Companies
Pacific Safety0.125-0.005
Knighthawk0.010.00
QHR Technologies Inc1.50+0.00
Cantex0.03-0.01
Anavex Life Sciences0.219+0.009
Metalex Ventures0.04-0.01
Russel Metals24.50-0.18
Copper Mountain Mining1.13+0.00
Colorado Resources0.125+0.010
ReliaBrand Inc0.006-0.001
Sunrise Resources Ltd0.045+0.000
Mission Ready Services0.255+0.020
Decisive Dividend Corporation1.80+0.02

 





FEATURED Property
2153995414 Morden Road
3 bedrooms 3 baths
$649,900
more details
image2image2image2
Click here to feature your property
Please wait... loading


CRA Notice of Assessment

Many Canadians rush to file their taxes on time each year and don’t think about it until the next year. One of the most overlooked notices received from the CRA annually is the annual Notice of ...


Medical confidential?

If ICBC asks your doctor for your information you may wonder: Can ICBC ask my doctor for my medical information? Can ICBC request a medical report from my doctor without my consent? What is ICBC entit...


Stay out of sales limbo!

Have you ever had a series of good meetings with a prospect … gathered all kinds of information … and given what you thought was a great presentation … only to receive a response ...

_








Member of BC Press Council


25574