Wednesday, May 27th21.3°C
26329
25263

Federal judge rules no-fly list unconstitutional, says people need better redress procedure

PORTLAND, Ore. - The U.S. government deprived 13 people on its no-fly list of their constitutional right to travel and gave them no adequate way to challenge their placement on the list, a federal judge said Tuesday in the nation's first ruling finding the no-fly list redress procedures unconstitutional.

U.S. District Court Judge Anna Brown's decision says the procedures lack a meaningful mechanism for people to challenge their placement on the list.

Thirteen people challenged their placement on the list in 2010, including four military veterans.

Initially, Brown said she couldn't rule on the case. In 2012, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision and sent the case back to her.

Brown said placement on the no-fly list turns routine travel into an "odyssey," and some of those on the list have been subjected to detention and interrogation by foreign authorities.

Brown had expressed skepticism at the government's arguments in several court hearings in 2013 and earlier this year. U.S. government attorneys cautioned the judge not to engage in "policymaking" were she to rule against them.

The ruling shows Brown heeded that caution. She did not create a new procedure for those on the list to challenge their placement. Instead, Brown said the Department of Homeland Security needs to find a way to disclose to those on the list the unclassified information used to place them there.

Since much of what is used for placement is classified, Brown said the government should provide people on the list the nature and extent of the classified information, the type of threat they pose to national security, and the ways in which they can respond to the charges.

The process "does not provide a meaningful mechanism for travellers who have been denied boarding to correct erroneous information in the government's terrorism databases," Brown ruled.

In January, a California woman successfully challenged her placement on the list, but the ruling did not address the broader constitutional implications.

U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson said government attorneys were reviewing the decision and would have no comment Tuesday.

American Civil Liberties Union attorney Hina Shamsi said: "This should serve as wakeup call to the government."

___

Reach reporter Nigel Duara on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/nigelduara

The Canadian Press


Read more Business News

26341


Recent Trending




Today's Market
S&P TSX15107.80+56.99
S&P CDNX691.19-0.77
DJIA18186.07+144.53
Nasdaq5106.59+73.84
S&P 5002123.48+19.28
CDN Dollar0.8026-0.0016
Gold1187.40-16.90
Oil58.31-0.70
Lumber273.50-2.70
Natural Gas2.825+0.003

 
Okanagan Companies
Pacific Safety0.135-0.005
Knighthawk0.010.00
QHR Technologies Inc1.50-0.01
Cantex0.03-0.01
Anavex Life Sciences0.402-0.030
Metalex Ventures0.08-0.01
Russel Metals25.51+0.30
Copper Mountain Mining1.27-0.01
Colorado Resources0.11+0.01
ReliaBrand Inc0.014+0.006
Sunrise Resources Ltd0.04+0.01
Mission Ready Services0.155+0.005
Decisive Dividend Corporation2.10+0.16

 



26341

FEATURED Property
2310977547 - 1088 Sunset Drive
2 bedrooms 2 baths
$419,300
more details
image2image2image2
Click here to feature your property
Please wait... loading


Cash stressed seniors

Photo: Thinkstock.comFor many Canadian homeowners, their house represents the biggest portion of their net worth. Now, increasing numbers of seniors are starting to recognize the hidden value of their...


Do or do not

Photo: Thinkstock.com“The optimist sees the rose and not its thorns; the pessimist stares at the thorns, oblivious of the rose.” - Kahlil Gibran Good planning is all about managing chan...


Penetrate the smokescreen

Photo: ContributedHas this ever happened to you? You’re in the middle of your second or third “good discussion” with a prospect. Everything’s going great. The prospect seems en...

_



26418

26418


Member of BC Press Council


25334