Friday, February 27th-1.1°C
25355
24657

Federal judge rules no-fly list unconstitutional, says people need better redress procedure

PORTLAND, Ore. - The U.S. government deprived 13 people on its no-fly list of their constitutional right to travel and gave them no adequate way to challenge their placement on the list, a federal judge said Tuesday in the nation's first ruling finding the no-fly list redress procedures unconstitutional.

U.S. District Court Judge Anna Brown's decision says the procedures lack a meaningful mechanism for people to challenge their placement on the list.

Thirteen people challenged their placement on the list in 2010, including four military veterans.

Initially, Brown said she couldn't rule on the case. In 2012, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision and sent the case back to her.

Brown said placement on the no-fly list turns routine travel into an "odyssey," and some of those on the list have been subjected to detention and interrogation by foreign authorities.

Brown had expressed skepticism at the government's arguments in several court hearings in 2013 and earlier this year. U.S. government attorneys cautioned the judge not to engage in "policymaking" were she to rule against them.

The ruling shows Brown heeded that caution. She did not create a new procedure for those on the list to challenge their placement. Instead, Brown said the Department of Homeland Security needs to find a way to disclose to those on the list the unclassified information used to place them there.

Since much of what is used for placement is classified, Brown said the government should provide people on the list the nature and extent of the classified information, the type of threat they pose to national security, and the ways in which they can respond to the charges.

The process "does not provide a meaningful mechanism for travellers who have been denied boarding to correct erroneous information in the government's terrorism databases," Brown ruled.

In January, a California woman successfully challenged her placement on the list, but the ruling did not address the broader constitutional implications.

U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson said government attorneys were reviewing the decision and would have no comment Tuesday.

American Civil Liberties Union attorney Hina Shamsi said: "This should serve as wakeup call to the government."

___

Reach reporter Nigel Duara on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/nigelduara

The Canadian Press


Read more Business News




Recent Trending




Today's Market
S&P TSX15234.34-6.82
S&P CDNX706.73+5.80
DJIA18132.70-81.72
Nasdaq4963.528-24.362
S&P 5002104.50-6.24
CDN Dollar0.7996+0.0004
Gold1203.00+6.10
Oil51.92+1.53
Lumber297.20+1.20
Natural Gas2.895-0.007

 
Okanagan Companies
Pacific Safety0.12+0.005
Knighthawk0.010.00
QHR Technologies Inc1.55-0.03
Cantex0.035-0.005
Anavex Life Sciences0.190.00
Metalex Ventures0.035-0.005
Russel Metals25.38+0.08
Copper Mountain Mining1.30+0.04
Colorado Resources0.15+0.015
ReliaBrand Inc0.008-0.0007
Sunrise Resources Ltd0.05+0.015
Mission Ready Services0.235+0.025

 



25320

FEATURED Property
19956555738 Goudie Road
5 bedrooms 4 baths
$1,790,000
more details
image2image2image2
Click here to feature your property
Please wait... loading


Creating your retirement vision

A vision means different things to different people. To the head of a large corporation, it’s the ability to chart a course that will deliver success (think Steve Jobs and Apple), to a shaman, i...


Are you asking the right questions?

Have you ever had this happen to you? You are in the middle of your second or third good discussion with a prospect and everything seems to be going great. The prospect seems engaged and happy to work...


It's OK to say 'I'm sorry'

Photo: ContributedStand-up comedians and sitcoms have been making fun of Canadians for being polite as long as I can remember. Being known for our niceness is certainly not a bad thing and I wish more...

_








Member of BC Press Council


24843