Sunday, October 4th1.7°C

US judge considers sending Angelina Jolie stuntwoman's phone hacking lawsuit to UK

LOS ANGELES, Calif. - A federal judge in Los Angeles suggested Monday that Great Britain would be the proper place for a Hollywood stuntwoman to pursue a lawsuit against News Corp. and related companies over alleged phone hacking.

But after hearing legal arguments, U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald said he would consider it further.

Fitzgerald's statement against the plaintiff undercuts efforts by New York lawyer Norman Siegel to take on Rupert Murdoch's companies in a U.S. courtroom, where discovery laws are more liberal than in England. Siegel is seeking more details about the alleged hacking scheme.

Eunice Huthart, a stunt double for Angelina Jolie, alleges her phone was hacked in 2004 and 2005 while she was in Hollywood filming "Mr. & Mrs. Smith." Jolie and Brad Pitt became a romantic item during that movie, and it was reported by the Sun newspaper. Huthart alleges they found out about it by hacking her cellphone.

She says she did not learn of the intrusion until British police came to see her in 2011 when the hacking scandal broke.

Siegel told the judge that sending the case to Great Britain would be tantamount to a dismissal because most cases associated with the hacking scandal have already been resolved and deadlines have passed for filing suits there.

He argued that the alleged violation of Huthart's rights occurred in the United States. "When the attack on privacy occurs within our borders it should not go unpunished," Siegel said.

The judge said Huthart was the victim of "what seems undisputed as a shocking violation of her privacy." But he suggested the underlying motive of the lawsuit was to get her monetary damages.

"I would not be here if all this was about was a check," said Siegel, a veteran civil rights lawyer.

"Counsel, this case is about a check," Fitzgerald said.

"It is not," Siegel said.

Defence attorney Joseph M. Terry said Huthart is an English citizen and her case belongs in Britain.

"When they choose a forum for more liberal discovery rules, that is forum shopping," he said. "They can't choose a forum because they think the laws will allow them to (question News Corp. chairman) Rupert Murdoch."

"You have a very interesting case," the judge said. "If this was a personal decision, I'd like to keep you here. And Ms. Jolie being a witness would be very interesting. But given that, I believe it belongs in England."

Fitzgerald did not set a date for his final ruling.

The Canadian Press

Read more Business News


Recent Trending

Today's Market
S&P TSX13339.74+97.85
S&P CDNX525.56-0.33
S&P 5001951.36+27.54
CDN Dollar0.7602+0.0057
Natural Gas2.47+0.04

Okanagan Companies
Pacific Safety0.215+0.000
QHR Technologies Inc1.19+0.01
Metalex Ventures0.06+0.00
Russel Metals21.48-0.07
Copper Mountain Mining0.42+0.03
Colorado Resources0.08+0.01
ReliaBrand Inc0.004-0.000
Sunrise Resources Ltd0.02+0.00
Mission Ready Services0.095+0.005
Decisive Dividend Corp3.49+0.45
Diamcor Mining0.90+0.02



23132401942 Hidden Lake Place
3 bedrooms 4 baths
more details
Click here to feature your property
Please wait... loading

Living beyond 100

Photo: ContributedThere was a time most careers involved an apprenticeship of one sort another. Some official, others involving years of servitude, and others time simply spent watching and emulating ...

Collateral mortgage

Photo: Thinkstock.comMost of the time I recommend that my clients not take a collateral type mortgage product, as it locks you in with the current lender and at maturity the mortgage is costly to tran...

5 Claim misconceptions

Photo: Thinkstock.comIf you have been hurt in an accident or as a result of medical negligence you will likely look to your friends and family for some advice on how to deal with the situation. These ...




Member of BC Press Council