The magic-pill defence

A family doctor recently shared her frustration with me about one of my clients.

I had arranged the discussion. I asked if there was anything more my client could do to recover from her crash injuries

It is one of my roles as a personal injury lawyer. I do what I can to ensure that my clients do anything and everything possible to get better.

By doing so, I avoid the dreaded magic-pill defence.

It’s an effective defence that plays on our natural, human optimism.

Imagine it is four years after a crash. You have undergone full courses of physiotherapy and chiropractic care. Even with all your efforts, your condition has remained unchanged since about a year after the crash.

ICBC hires a medical specialist to examine you. The specialist recommends something, anything. Perhaps it’s a particular type of therapy that you haven’t tried, like IMS, trigger point injections, or prolotherapy. 

Maybe it’s an active rehabilitation program supervised by a kinesiologist.

The specialist might, ironically, blame your lack of progress on the depression that has developed as a result of your chronic pain, and recommend anti-depressant medication and psychological counselling.

It might be extremely unlikely that any of these recommendations will actually lead to a significant improvement in your condition, especially so long after the crash.

Natural human optimism, though, can lead to the hope that they truly are magic pills.

That hopeful optimism will result in a reduction of compensation for your losses that are likely to continue into the future.

The value of an ICBC claim is the value of the loss. The greater the hope a magic pill will work, the lower your compensation.

How do you protect against an unfair reduction in compensation based on the faint hope placed on a magic pill?

Take the magic pill.

By proactively ensuring that my clients seek out and follow through with whatever care recommendations might be offered, I avoid coming up against magic pills.

This is where my job as a personal injury lawyer directly aligns with the family doctor’s job as a medical care giver. We both want to get our client/patient as recovered as possible as quickly as possible.

So why was this family doctor frustrated?

My client had relied on a chiropractor for her primary care, and had gone to her family doctor only as she needed to for referrals.

The family doctor had done her best to manage her patient’s care, but the patient made it very difficult. It is impossible to manage care if your patient doesn’t regularly return to report on progress and seek updated care recommendations.

Of course, she was frustrated.  She was being asked to do the impossible.

I do my best to coach my clients about avoiding this frustration. Your doctor is not simply a referral source.  She is one of your best hopes for maximizing your recovery.

There is nothing wrong with relying on your chiropractor to manage your care, but don’t lose out on the benefit of your family doctor’s expertise.

Independently consult with your family doctor, ask for and follow through with her care recommendations and keep her updated on your progress.

What if her recommendations conflict with those of your chiropractor or any other medical practitioner? We’re all on the same team. A quick telephone call between them should resolve any conflicts.

By the way, if you come up to a magic pill, embrace the optimism when you take it. The more optimistic you are that care will help you, the more likely it will.


Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.

More Achieving Justice articles

About the Author

Paul Hergott began practicing law in 1995, in a general litigation practice. Of the various areas of litigation, he became most drawn to, and passionate about, pursuing fair compensation for injured victims. This gradually became his exclusive area of practice.

In 2007, Paul opened Hergott Law, a boutique personal injury law firm in the Central Interior, serving personal injury clients from all over British Columbia. Paul’s practice is restricted to acting only for the injured victim, never for ICBC or for other insurance companies.

Paul became a weekly newspaper columnist in January of 2007, when his first column entitled “It’s not about screwing the Insurance Company” was published. 

Please feel free to email or call Paul (1.855.437.4688) with legal issues you might like him to write about in his column, or to offer your feedback about something he has written.

Email:   [email protected]
Firm website:  www.hlaw.ca
Achieving Justice Legal Blog:  http://www.hlaw.ca/category/all-columns/
One Crash is Too Many Road Safety Campaign: www.onecrashistoomany.com
Google Plus:  https://plus.google.com/+HlawCanada/posts
Facebook:  www.facebook.com/personalinjurylawfirm
Twitter:   twitter.com/Hergott_Law

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories