Creep-catcher backtrack

Ignorance abounds!

I am not intending to use that word with a “stupidity” connotation. My declaration is the written version of a selfie.

Merriam-Webster online defines ignorance as “a lack of knowledge, understanding, or education." 

I don’t lack education. It’s the lack of knowledge and understanding I’m referring to.

My last column featured the creep-catcher “sting” of a predatory adult who actively pursued sexualized communications and a meeting with someone he thought was a 14-year-old girl. 

The “catcher," Shoni, was a 31-year-old woman. She had been victimized as a 14 year old.

The video is compelling. It wasn’t the “Yer done, bud” testosterone-laden spectacle I was expecting to see. 

Shoni seemed genuinely interested in making a difference by protecting young girls from being victimized like she had been. 

While she knew the posting of her video was going to cause devastation to the husband and father she was sitting across from, she also showed an interest in helping him understand the consequences of his actions and provided resources where he could get help.

I was reluctant to endorse the creep-catcher movement because of obvious problems with unregulated, undisciplined vigilante cowboys sticking their noses in police business. But I felt a sense of security for the safety of my early-teen daughters that Shoni is doing the work she is doing.

I am thankful to those who contacted me after reading my column, with efforts to improve my knowledge and understanding about the dark side of creep catchers.

The video I had seen is on one end of a dramatically broad spectrum. My eyes were opened to the opposite end.

A community support worker told me about a developmentally challenged client, living with fetal alcohol syndrome, who was devastated by a creep-catcher sting. 

Unlike the predator in the video I saw, her client wasn’t on the prowl for a sexual encounter with an under-aged girl. He was pursued by the “catcher” on an adult-dating site.

He did meet with the catcher, who did the “bait and switch” thing, revealing that even though she was on an adult-dating site, she was really under aged. 

He was clear in the chat communications leading up to the meeting that there would be nothing sexual.

There was absolutely nothing morally nor criminally wrong with this developmentally challenged fellow’s behaviour. 

The face-to-face creep catcher confrontation, as well as being featured on social media and the creep-catcher’s website were horribly unfair and destructive to him.

This was not an isolated event. I learned from someone else about another vulnerable victim of creep catchers, this time a situation of mistaken identity, who had already been suicidal before the sting that occurred within the last several months. 

She has since taken her own life.

The public shaming of a perceived pedophile is a present-day lynching. A life is not taken in a literal sense, but a life can be destroyed, including to the point of a suicide.

My endorsement of creep catchers in my last column, albeit reluctant, was based on my ignorance about the horrible injustices that can result, just like the horrible injustices of historical lynchings that we now look back on with disgust.

Is there a place for creep catchers in our society? Vigilante lynching is not, and will never be, OK. 

I am embarrassed that I had not seen the direct analogy to actually stringing someone up on a tree. 

I am disappointed in myself that I had publicly endorsed such conduct. 

Please accept my apology.

I do think that there is a place for passionate volunteers, like Shoni, looking to protect young girls from predators. 

One way might be for police forces to train and make use of these incredible volunteer resources. Another idea might be for the stings to continue, but without the public shaming element.  

I welcome the opportunity to participate in the dialogue.


Comments are pre-moderated to ensure they meet our guidelines. Approval times will vary. Keep it civil, and stay on topic. If you see an inappropriate comment, please use the ‘flag’ feature. Comments are the opinions of the comment writer, not of Castanet. Comments remain open for one day after a story is published and are closed on weekends. Visit Castanet’s Forums to start or join a discussion about this story.

More Achieving Justice articles

About the Author

Paul Hergott began practicing law in 1995, in a general litigation practice. Of the various areas of litigation, he became most drawn to, and passionate about, pursuing fair compensation for injured victims. This gradually became his exclusive area of practice.

In 2007, Paul opened Hergott Law, a boutique personal injury law firm in the Central Interior, serving personal injury clients from all over British Columbia. Paul’s practice is restricted to acting only for the injured victim, never for ICBC or for other insurance companies.

Paul became a weekly newspaper columnist in January of 2007, when his first column entitled “It’s not about screwing the Insurance Company” was published. 

Please feel free to email or call Paul (1.855.437.4688) with legal issues you might like him to write about in his column, or to offer your feedback about something he has written.

Email:   [email protected]
Firm website:  www.hlaw.ca
Achieving Justice Legal Blog:  http://www.hlaw.ca/category/all-columns/
One Crash is Too Many Road Safety Campaign: www.onecrashistoomany.com
Google Plus:  https://plus.google.com/+HlawCanada/posts
Facebook:  www.facebook.com/personalinjurylawfirm
Twitter:   twitter.com/Hergott_Law

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories