234250
233182
The-Last-Word

Sue your spouse?

You and your husband are running an errand. Your husband is driving, and the roads are icy. Your husband isn’t driving for the conditions, and ploughs into the back of another vehicle at a red light.

Your neck seizes up something terrible, and you end up with a pounding headache that just won’t quit. You know from having read my column that you should seek legal advice to ensure you are not taken advantage of by the insurance company.

You and your husband have been paying for vehicle insurance for years. You expect that the insurance company will have no problem providing you with fair compensation for your injuries. You obviously have not read enough of my columns.

The lawyer advises you that your insurance is meaningless. Rather, it is your husband’s insurance that matters, because he is the one who caused your injuries. You are told that in order to achieve fair compensation, you will need to pursue a claim against your husband.

If the insurance company doesn’t treat you fairly, you will have to actually sue your husband to force the issue. What? How is that for putting a chill on chit-chat around the dinner table. What about your relationship with your mother-in-law, who is likely to treat you with even more contempt with a lawsuit hanging over her son’s head?

What has the lawyer been smoking? But, it’s true, and, if you think about it, it makes a whole lot of sense. In our society, those who are careless and cause injury have a legal responsibility to compensate the victims for their losses. It doesn’t matter if there is a family relationship involved, the responsibility is there.

Apart from insurance, it wouldn’t make sense for a wife to sue her husband, because his assets are typically her assets and vice versa, but with insurance, it makes lots of sense.

You see, your husband has liability insurance just like every other British Columbia driver, with good money paid, in premiums, for that insurance. The insurance company collects insurance premiums from millions of British Columbia drivers, with the premiums used to fund claims made by the injured victims of careless driving.

It doesn’t matter to the insurance policy that the injured victim happens to be a family member of the careless driver. The policy, which has been bought and paid for, requires the insurance company to take financial responsibility for your husband’s careless  driving. It makes no difference that the injured victim is his wife. The only way to force the insurance company to pay fair compensation is to do so by way of a lawsuit, which may result in a trial. Once again, that’s the case regardless of whether or not there is a family connection between the negligent driver and the injured victim.

Your husband will not be bothered by it at all. If a lawsuit is required, he will simply hand over the legal paperwork to the insurance company who will look after everything. I am continually giving advice about this stuff, and have found that the reality of how automobile insurance works is not common knowledge.

I wonder how many legitimate injury claims are not made because of ignorance.

I also wonder how many millions of dollars insurance companies save on an annual basis because of that ignorance.

This article is written by or on behalf of an outsourced columnist and does not necessarily reflect the views of Castanet.



More The Last Word articles

234249
About the Author

Lawyer Paul Hergott began writing as a columnist in January 2007. 

Achieving Justice, based on Paul’s personal injury practice at the time, focused on injury claims and road safety.  It was published weekly for 13½ years until July 2020, when his busy legal practice no longer left time for writing.

Paul was able to pick up writing again in January 2024. After transitioning his practice to estate administration and management.

Paul’s intention is to write primarily about end of life and estate related matters, but he is very easily distracted by other topics.

You are encouraged to contact Paul directly at [email protected] with legal questions and issues you would like him to write about.



234249
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



235047


234248