Money talks

My last column had to do with assigning legal liability (blame) for a camping injury to my ten-year-old daughter's finger.  I did a "tongue in cheek" analysis of blame, admitting that Santa Clause wasn't the "plump, jolly culprit" who idiotically put a dangerously sharp pocket knife into her hands as a Christmas gift, it was me.  I concluded with the notion that a child suffering a permanent injury or sexual abuse might achieve "a cathartic justice beyond compare" by bringing a lawsuit against neglectful or abusive parents.

A reader signing herself "Sick of this crap!" sent me a responding e-mail.  She described my way of thinking as "typical of injury lawyers" and said that insurance and liability costs have gone through the roof because of it.  She noted that it's lawyers like me who "have sapped so much creativity away in everyday life in our society and instead of self responsibility we listen to you people looking for the mighty buck."  She concluded by thanking me for "showing just what a leach your business is".

At the root of the matter, she's bang-on correct.  There would be no need for liability insurance if each of us had sole responsibility for our own safety and had no ability to seek fair financial compensation from others when injuries occurred.

That's the "mighty buck" she referred to.  Our legal system is based on fair and balanced compensation for actual losses.  An injury puts you into a hole, the hole representing your actual losses (injuries, pain and discomfort, income loss, treatment expense, etc.).  Our legal system provides a mechanism (lawsuit) to require those responsible to fill that hole.  There's no way to really, truly fill the hole by turning back time and making it that the injury did not occur, so the only thing to fill the hole with is financial compensation.

Drivers, businesses, manufacturers and the insurance companies who protect them don't readily step up to the plate to provide fair financial compensation, which gives the "injury lawyer" the job of forcing them to. 

Insurance premiums are set at a level high enough so that there will be enough money to fill any holes (sometimes craters) caused by the insured driver, business, automobile manufacturer, home owner, etc.

I believe in accountability.  I believe that those causing injuries by their negligent driving, dangerous business premises, malfunctioning manufactured items, etc., should be accountable to their victims.  I believe that if you create a hole, you should have to fill it.  This is no different than if you borrow money, you should have to pay it back.

I also believe that "money talks".  A business is much less likely to incur the expense to repair a loose tile, ensure the pool deck isn't slippery, fix a dangerous design flaw in a car seat, and take all other manner of steps to avoid causing injuries if they could not be held accountable for the injuries they cause.

The dollars spent by ICBC to make roads safer is not spent out of the goodness of their hearts, it's to reduce the number of holes they have to fill.  Grocery stores aren't some of the safest places on the planet because the huge corporations owning them care about their customers, it's because they want to reduce the number of holes they have to fill.  The same goes for strict engineering standards for the construction of homes, bridges, schools and playgrounds. 

In a sense, and in my view this isn't a stretch at all, we can thank "injury lawyers" for our remarkably safe environment.

Unfortunately, it seems that the high cost of automobile insurance is not enough money to "talk" to drivers.  Every crash that I deal with would have been prevented simply by the offending driver paying more attention to the road ahead.  Perhaps "paying in advance" with liability insurance premiums for your share of what it costs to fill holes due to your negligent driving doesn't "talk" like it should. 

Maybe "Accountability in advance" isn't accountability at all.  Perhaps there should be a significant financial penalty that goes along with causing a crash, far beyond a $100-200 traffic ticket.

Apart from personal accountability, our driving attitudes need to change.  We can each of us pull our weight to help change the attitudes around us.  We need to live and breathe the reality, in my view, that "one crash is too many".

More Achieving Justice articles

About the Author

Paul Hergott began practicing law in 1995, in a general litigation practice. Of the various areas of litigation, he became most drawn to, and passionate about, pursuing fair compensation for injured victims. This gradually became his exclusive area of practice.

In 2007, Paul opened Hergott Law, a boutique personal injury law firm in the Central Interior, serving personal injury clients from all over British Columbia. Paul’s practice is restricted to acting only for the injured victim, never for ICBC or for other insurance companies.

Paul became a weekly newspaper columnist in January of 2007, when his first column entitled “It’s not about screwing the Insurance Company” was published. 

Please feel free to email or call Paul (1.855.437.4688) with legal issues you might like him to write about in his column, or to offer your feedback about something he has written.

Email:   [email protected]
Firm website:  www.hlaw.ca
Achieving Justice Legal Blog:  http://www.hlaw.ca/category/all-columns/
One Crash is Too Many Road Safety Campaign: www.onecrashistoomany.com
Google Plus:  https://plus.google.com/+HlawCanada/posts
Facebook:  www.facebook.com/personalinjurylawfirm
Twitter:   twitter.com/Hergott_Law

The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories