- Fundraising bear-killing fine
Texada Island 10:20am - 2,906 views - Benefit game for killed teens
Alberta 7:00am - 4,270 views - Future of B.C. separatism
BC 6:40am - 9,284 views - Hiker likely saved paraglider Vancouver Island Feb 7 - 13,669 views
- Upset with tariff response
BC Feb 6 - 11,208 views - Ice fishers forced onto boats
Cranbrook Feb 6 - 10,465 views - Reporters were allowed in
BC Feb 6 - 8,944 views - B.C. appeals to top court
BC Feb 6 - 10,879 views
BC News
B.C. couple loses bid for $2,500 wedding caterer refund
Couple's claim dismissed
B.C.’s Civil Resolution Tribunal says a B.C. couple won’t be getting $2,500 back from a caterer they claimed did a poor job of serving their wedding reception dinner.
Daniel Folino and Maria Vriniotis said they hired the respondent, W.W. Catering Ltd., doing business as Brock House Restaurant, to cater their wedding.
The couple claimed Vancouver's Brock House breached the parties’ agreement by providing food that was of poor quality and inconsistently sized portions.
And, they said, Brock House’s staff improperly consumed ice cream from a third-party vendor the applicants hired, costing the couple money.
In her Jan. 10 decision, tribunal vice-chair Andrea Ritchie said Folino and Vriniotis sought a total of $2,500. They are self-represented.
However, Brock House denied breaching the parties’ agreement.
It says the food was presented as agreed and that there was no agreement about portion size.
Still, Brock House acknowledged some of its staff consumed ice cream from the vendor, but says it provided the couple with a $500 goodwill discount to account for both the ice cream costs and their complaints about the food presentation.
“It denies the applicants are entitled to any further compensation,” Ritchie said.
Folino and Vriniotis argued the $500 discount was specifically to deal with sloppy and inconsistent plating, not for the ice cream.
“They say once the $500 is deducted, they still request a $2,000 refund for the sloppy plating, plus $110 for the ice cream, for a total of $2,110,” Ritchie said.
Ritchie found Folino and Vriniotis were not entitled to further compensation and dismissed the claim.
More BC News
Featured Flyer
Big game on the big screenOliver - 12:05 pm
Use agreement was unclearMerritt - 12:00 pm
Pet of the weekKelowna - 12:00 pm
Vees claim 4th straight winPenticton - 11:30 am
Measles exposure at eventManitoba - 11:15 am















