233496
234854
Dan-in-Ottawa

Libs don't have a plan

The week, the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) released an analysis of the most recent Liberal government budget. 

While sharp and measured non-partisan budget analysis is common from the PBO, one particular fact from the report has generated considerable attention on Parliament Hill.

The conclusion from the PBO was, and I quote it directly: 

  • “Budget 2018 provides an incomplete account of the changes to the government’s $186.7 billion infrastructure spending plan. PBO requested the new plan, but it does not exist. Roughly one-quarter of the funding allocated for infrastructure from 2016-17 to 2018-19 will lapse. Both legacy and new infrastructure programs are prone to large lapses.”

As I have mentioned in previous MP reports, it is not necessarily uncommon for some budgeted funds to lapse or to remain unspent for a variety of reasons. 

What is unique in this situation is the finding from the PBO that an appropriate infrastructure plan does not exist at all. 

The Liberal government has been subsequently asked about this in Question Period but has not provided any formal documented Infrastructure Plan.

This raises serious concerns on how $186 billion is proposed to be borrowed and spent without a proper plan or how those funds are best invested for maximum return over the next twelve years.

After promising an Infrastructure Plan during the 2015 election, how can there be no plan in place?

This is a question only the Liberal government can answer. 

A February 2018 analysis by the Globe and Mail newspaper indicated that Liberals may be playing old-fashioned, “pork barrel” type politics as 64 per cent of infrastructure spending to date has been in areas of Canada where the Liberals are typically elected.

It would be interesting to submit an Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Prime Minister’s office for more analysis on the political involvement in the decision making process. However, despite the Prime Minister’s election promise that his own office and any minister’s office would be fully subject to FOI/ATIP legislation, this has not occurred. 

For the record, I am not suggesting the Liberals are playing favouritism with how and where they fund infrastructure projects. Although the data from the Globe and Mail reporting raises some serious questions, there may well be legitimate answers. 

Where I do fault the Liberal government is, without a proper and coherent Infrastructure Plan along with the ability to FOI supporting documents, Canadians are largely being left in the dark about this process and how it works.

Considering that it will be Canadians shouldering this $186 billion of debt, more information is required. 

My question this week is about transparency:

  • Do you believe this Liberal Government is living up to the transparency commitments they made during the election and does this concern you? 

I can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free 1-800-665-8711.

This article is written by or on behalf of an outsourced columnist and does not necessarily reflect the views of Castanet.



More Dan in Ottawa articles



227908
About the Author

Dan Albas is the Member of Parliament for the riding of Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola and the co-chair of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations.

Before entering public life, Dan was the owner of Kick City Martial Arts, responsible for training hundreds of men, women and youth to bring out their best.

Dan  is consistently recognized as one of Canada’s top 10 most active Members of Parliament on Twitter (@danalbas) and also continues to write a weekly column published in many local newspapers and on this website.

Dan welcomes comments, questions and concerns from citizens and is often available to speak to groups and organizations on matters of federal concern. 

He can be reached at [email protected] or call toll free at 1-800-665-8711.



230488
The views expressed are strictly those of the author and not necessarily those of Castanet. Castanet does not warrant the contents.

Previous Stories



233972


235941