Energy/labour debates dominate
In last week’s MP report I wrote, “On Wednesday, the Liberal Government announced a new pipeline review process, and on Thursday, the Official Opposition Conservatives will table a motion calling on the Liberal Government to express support for the Energy East project, along with a number of other conditions.”
I have included the reference above, as I can now update this information.
The Liberal Government did announce a revised pipeline review process that, contrary to promises of an entirely new process, takes much of the existing process and adds some new considerations.
Some of these considerations include more public consultations, in particular with First Nations. Upstream GHG (greenhouse gas emissions) will now be assessed as well. The combined effect of these new measures means the review process will be further delayed.
My thoughts on the new review policy?
Having met with several groups and citizens who oppose new Canadian pipeline development, the message often communicated is that new pipelines will not be supported under any circumstance. Thus, lengthening the review process is, in my view, unlikely to sway those opposed to pipelines.
Within twenty four hours of the new review process announcement, many prominent anti-pipeline organizations, including some First Nations groups, rejected the Liberal changes.
Ultimately, delaying the decision is an unhelpful measure. I do see value in tracking GHG emissions, however all infrastructure projects have a GHG footprint, and selectively tracking GHG emissions from some projects and not others seems counter-productive, if the Liberal Government is serious about meeting reduced GHG emission targets.
This leads to the Opposition motion that reads:
Given this time of economic uncertainty, the House: (a) recognizes the importance of the energy sector to the Canadian economy, and supports its development in an environmentally sustainable way; (b) agrees that pipelines are the safest way to transport oil; (c) acknowledges the desire for the Energy East pipeline expressed by the provincial governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and New Brunswick; and (d) expresses its support for the Energy East pipeline currently under consideration.
Although this motion did not call for Energy East to be formerly approved, it was still rejected by the Liberal Government in a whipped vote, and was opposed by the NDP in a similar manner.
It is clear that the debate on Canadian pipelines is far from over.
Under debate as well this week is Government Bill C-4 from the Liberals, which proposes a number of changes, mostly related to unions. Specifically, the right for a worker to have a private ballot when voting on unionization for a federally regulated work environment is being repealed under this bill.
Also being repealed is the union fiscal transparency act that would require unions to publicly disclose wages, benefits and other union expenses taken from tax deductible union dues.
Ironically on the same day the Liberals announced Bill C-4, Elections Canada reported the Liberal Party of Canada had taken an illegal union donation during the October election. As the Official opposition, we believe in increased financial transparency, and the right to a private ballot for workers. We will oppose this bill.
I welcome your comments, questions and concerns and can be reached at [email protected] or toll free at 1.800.665.8711.
The buzz coming out of Ottawa this week is talk of a national unity crisis.
This comes after Montreal Mayor Dennis Coderre announced strong opposition to the proposed Energy East pipeline project, a project that is supported by the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and New Brunswick.
The opposition from the mayor was particularly not well-received in Alberta, which has, for decades, diligently paid into the Canadian equalization program that annually pays out billions of dollars to Quebec and none to Alberta, or, for that matter, to British Columbia or Saskatchewan.
Well-known CBC comedian Rick Mercer entered into the debate, focusing a rant segment entirely in support of the Energy East project while lambasting the stance taken by Mayor Coderre.
As a result, the subject of pipelines has featured prominently in Ottawa this week. On Wednesday, the Liberal Government announced a new pipeline review process, and on Thursday, the Official Opposition Conservatives will table a motion calling on the Liberal Government to express support for the Energy East project, along with a number of other conditions.
At the time of my writing this week’s MP report, it is unknown what the new pipeline review process will be, or what the outcome of the motion on Thursday will be.
Also occurring this week is debate on the response to the Throne Speech, a debate in which I was honoured to participate. One of my reasons for speaking was to raise the importance of resource industries in rural communities. Here in Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola, there are multiple lumber mills and a number of mines that are large-scale regional employers. I also raised the subject of civic infrastructure, as well as the importance of a new softwood lumber agreement to our British Columbia economy, including the need to focus on inter-Provincial trade.
Before I close this week’s report, I would like to invite citizens to hold me to account at a public forum I will be hosting in West Kelowna on Saturday, January 30th, at 6 p.m.. This forum will be held at the Westbank Lions Community Centre. There is no admission to attend, and no advance registration required.
For those who cannot attend this forum, I will be hosting more forums in other communities. As well, I always welcome your calls and emails. I can be reached via email or by phone at 1.800.665.8711.
This past week, the world was horrified to learn of yet another terror attack, this time in Burkina Faso, where roughly 30 citizens, including six Canadians from Quebec, were murdered in a senseless act of violence.
Particularly disturbing is that these Canadians were all serving in the region as humanitarian workers, helping those who are less fortunate.
This terror attack has renewed calls on the Liberal Government to state a clear and coherent position on the allied campaign against terrorism.
As many citizens will recall, the Liberals made a promise that they, if elected, would immediately withdrawal Canada’s CF-18s from the allied aerial campaign against ISIS. With the election over last October, the Liberal Government has stated it will honour this promise, however to date our CF-18s continue to be a valuable part of the coalition air campaign against ISIS.
This week, there is a meeting in Paris of our allied Defence Ministers in Paris on the coalition against ISIS, and has been widely reported, Canada was not invited.
Although the Liberal Government has been clear that it intends to withdraw our CF-18 aircraft, the Government has also stated it will implement other measures that have yet to be announced.
The Official Opposition believes that Canada should continue to stand with our allies in the war against terror, as it has long been a Canadian tradition to stand with our allies to fight for those who are less fortunate or unable to stand against tyranny and oppression.
This remains a challenging subject, and one that can be divisive. I hear frequently from citizens who strongly support the mission, but also hear from those who are upset that our CF-18’s are still actively bombing, despite promises that they would be withdrawn. I will continue to provide updates on this subject as they become available.
On an entirely different subject, late last week the Supreme Court announced that it will extend the deadline for Parliament to provide a legislative response to the assisted suicide ruling from last year. Although the Government requested a six month extension, the Supreme Court granted four months to reflect the time Parliament was dissolved as a result of the recent election.
There are roughly twelve weeks in which the House of Commons will be sitting over the next four months, so this will be a subject that will likely feature prominently once the House of Commons resumes sitting next week.
Although much of my time will be spent in Ottawa over the next few months, I welcome your comments, questions, and concerns. One of the highlights of my time in Ottawa is hearing directly from citizens throughout Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola on issues of importance to our local communities. In turn I am often able to share this information in member’s statements, speeches, and questions within the House of Commons.
I am truly excited for this next Parliament to get underway, and to begin raising issues of concern in Ottawa. Ultimately this is how we help build a stronger Canada.
I can be reached at [email protected] or by phone at 1.800.665.8711.
For a variety of reasons, the subject of international trade has been prominent in federal politics over this past week.
One issue frequently raised of late is a deal between General Dynamics Land Systems, located in Ontario, to sell light armoured vehicles (LAV’s) to Saudi Arabia.
This deal was supported by the former Conservative Government. It is valued at $15 Billion, and will sustain 3,000 jobs over the next decade.
The controversy over this deal has been re-ignited, though, given the Government of Saudi Arabia’s recent and public execution of a large number of individuals, which provoked international condemnation, including from Canada.
Some have suggested this deal should be cancelled, on account of the poor human rights record of the Saudi Arabia Government. To further complicate this subject, the Liberals were very critical of this sale when in opposition, but now, as Government, they have indicated the deal will not be cancelled.
In a related political twist, the official opposition critic has now called for the Liberal Government to justify the reasons for the sale.
On a similar theme, the subject of human rights records has so far not dominated the discussion that the Liberal Government may seek to complete a free trade agreement with the Government of China.
Currently Canada has a trade imbalance with China, as we export roughly $17 billion in largely resource products, and, in turn, import just under $60 Billion of mostly manufactured goods. That said, a recent report from the Canada China business council estimates a free trade deal with China could see Canada increase our exports by close to $8 billion over the next 15 years, and also create upwards of 25,000 new jobs (as was reported by the National Post).
It is expected the subject of a possible trade deal with China is one on which we will hear more, in the months ahead.
Finally, this week Canada’s Minister of International Trade, the Hon. Chrystia Freeland, has been making the rounds, including a visit to Vancouver, to consult on the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement that has not been formally ratified in Parliament.
To date, the Liberal Government has not indicated whether they will support the TPP agreement, although President Obama publicly stated, after meeting with Prime Minister Trudeau, that Canada will be signing on.
On a more local note, I contemplated crashing the Trade Minister’s Vancouver meetings to raise the importance of a new Canada / USA Softwood lumber agreement (a subject I have also raised in Ottawa). With the House returning in a few weeks, I will again raise the issue in the months ahead.
I have not heard much feedback on trade in our new riding of Central Okanagan Similkameen Nicola, and as such I welcome your comments, questions and concerns. I can be reached at [email protected] or toll free at 1.800.665.8711.
More Dan in Ottawa articles
- Preparing for Parliament Jan 7
- The political landscape Dec 31
- Open government, for some Dec 24
- GST going up? Dec 17
- The government's priorities Dec 10
- Ottawa abuzz Dec 3
- New timeline on refugees Nov 26
- A better future Nov 19
- The Reform Act (in practice) Nov 12
- Update in Ottawa Nov 5
- Contacting your MP Oct 29
- Final MP report Aug 6